Breivik has been charged with acts of terrorism but in the eyes of many, will he be considered a terrorist? The Beep labelled him as a gunman whereas CNN identified him as an assailant, but not a terrorist? Is there a prerequisite for anyone to be one? Has the name become a stereotype for all Islamists? Finally, today, an article named him a ‘Christian’ terrorist, it suggests there might be a presumption that the word has a newfound owner because the signifier ‘terrorist’ has changed over the years and is now reserved for men wearing a turban?

Also, find out about what people think about the outcome of his own doings, death penalty is banned in Norway and the longest sentence is 21 years, do you think he will ever be set free?

Join the debate.

[vimeo w=500&h=375]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.